Tulsa, OK & the Tulsa Metro
Mudjacking vs. Polyjacking: Which One Should You Choose?
Tulsa Concrete Leveling connects homeowners with one local professional who can inspect the slab and explain whether lower-cost mudjacking or lighter, water-resistant polyurethane foam fits the job. Call (918) 321-4446 for a free estimate.
If you've been quoted for concrete leveling, you've probably noticed that every contractor swears by whichever method they happen to sell. Mudjacking outfits will tell you foam is overpriced. Foam crews will tell you mudjacking is obsolete.
- Free estimates
- One local pro
- No obligation
Free estimates
No cost, no pressure
One local pro
Not a call list, no spam
No obligation
Compare and decide
What's Actually Different Between Them?
Both methods do the same job the same basic way: drill holes through the sunken slab, pump material into the void underneath, and raise the concrete back to level. The difference is the material.
Mudjacking (also called slab jacking) pumps a slurry of cement, soil, and water under the slab. It's the older method — contractors have been doing it for decades — and the material is cheap and dense.
Polyjacking (also called polyurethane foam leveling, foam jacking, or polyleveling) injects a two-part polymer that expands into rigid structural foam within seconds, filling the void and lifting the slab.
The Side-by-Side
| Mudjacking | Polyjacking | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per sq ft | $3–$6 | $5–$25 |
| Typical job cost | $500–$1,300 | $600–$2,000 |
| Injection holes | ~1⅝" (quarter-sized or larger) | ~⅝" (dime-sized) |
| Material weight | ~100+ lbs per cubic foot | ~2–4 lbs per cubic foot |
| Cure time | 24–72 hours before vehicle load | 15 minutes–a few hours |
| Water resistance | Can erode with water movement | Waterproof, doesn't wash out |
| Typical lifespan | 5–10 years | 10+ years, often slab lifetime |
| Best fit | Large exterior voids on a budget | Interior slabs, garages, unstable clay |
Read the per-square-foot row with three caveats. Rates apply only to the sunken area actually being lifted, not the slab's whole footprint — replacement prices the entire slab, which is why a lifting quote lands lower than the per-foot rates alone suggest. Most contractors charge a minimum job fee — roughly $300 to $700 — so a small slab costs more per square foot than the table implies. And square footage is only a rough guide: what actually drives the price is how deep the voids are and how much lift the slab needs. Structural or interior slabs run toward the top of the range and beyond.
When Mudjacking Wins
Price, mainly — and it's not a small difference on big jobs. If you have a long driveway with substantial voids, slurry fills that space at a fraction of foam's material cost. The dense slurry also provides solid, heavy support under large exterior slabs where added soil load matters less. If the slab is concrete you expect to replace within a decade anyway, paying the foam premium for a 15-year material can be money wasted. A 5–10 year mudjacking lift on a 30-year-old driveway is a perfectly rational purchase.
When Polyjacking Wins
Three situations make foam the clear call:
- Tulsa's clay soil. Our expansive clay is the reason your slab sank in the first place. Pumping a hundred pounds per cubic foot of slurry onto soil that's already moving adds load to the problem. Foam lifts at a fortieth of the weight.
- Anywhere cure time matters. A garage floor you need to park on tonight, a front walkway, an interior slab — foam takes vehicle weight within hours. See our garage floor leveling page for how this plays out on the most common indoor job.
- Water-prone areas. If the void formed because water moves under that slab, cement slurry can eventually erode along the same path. Foam doesn't wash out.
How to Decide in Two Minutes
Skip the sales pitch and answer three questions about your own slab:
- Where is it, and when do you need it back? An interior slab, a garage floor, or anything you need to park on tonight points to foam. A long exterior run where a day or two of cure time costs you nothing keeps mudjacking in play.
- Is the soil still moving? If the slab sits over backfill that is still compacting, or the ground keeps cycling wet and dry, the lighter material is the safer bet. If the settlement traced to a one-time event that has since been fixed, slurry holds fine.
- How long do you need the lift to last? If you expect to replace the concrete within a decade anyway, mudjacking's 5-to-10-year window may outlast your interest in the problem. If you are staying put, foam's longer hold usually justifies the premium.
What to Ask Whoever Quotes You
A good estimate answers these without being pushed:
- Do you offer both methods? A crew with one pump on the truck only ever recommends one method. Ask what they would do if they carried both.
- What caused the void? If nobody looks at the downspouts, the grading, or the irrigation line, nobody is fixing the actual problem.
- How much lift, and how will you measure it? "We'll level it" is not a spec. Ask how far the slab dropped and how they will know when it is back where it belongs.
- What happens if it settles again? Get the warranty terms in writing, and read what voids them.
The Question That Matters More Than the Method
Whichever material goes under the slab, the lift fails if the water problem that created the void keeps running. A good contractor will point at the downspout, the grading, or the drainage issue and tell you to fix it — even though that advice doesn't earn them a dime. That's exactly the kind of honesty an estimate should include, and it's what we look for in the local pro we refer Tulsa homeowners to.
For real numbers on what your specific surfaces are likely to cost, see our concrete leveling cost guide. Or skip ahead: call (918) 321-4446 or send the form on this page, and we'll connect you with one local concrete leveling contractor — one pro, not a call list — who works with both methods and will recommend the one your slab actually needs. The estimate is free, and there's no obligation.
Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Is polyjacking better than mudjacking?
Neither wins everywhere. Mudjacking is usually the lower-cost choice for large exterior voids on stable soil. Foam is lighter, faster to return to service, and resistant to washout. Use the comparison table on this page and a slab-specific estimate to decide which fits your job.
How much cheaper is mudjacking than polyjacking?
Mudjacking typically runs $3 to $6 per square foot, while polyjacking runs $5 to $25 per square foot depending on accessibility and slab type. Treat both as rough guides: most contractors charge a minimum job fee of about $300 to $700, so small slabs cost more per square foot than the ranges imply, and real pricing follows void depth and the amount of lift needed rather than surface area. See our cost guide for sourced local planning ranges.
How long does each method last?
Polyurethane foam is waterproof and chemically inert, so once it's in place it doesn't wash out or break down — lifts commonly hold 10 years or more, and often for the remaining life of the slab. Mudjacking slurry is a cement-based material that can erode or re-settle if water keeps moving through the soil beneath the slab, so lifts typically hold 5 to 10 years. In Tulsa's expansive clay, the bigger factor for either method is whether the underlying water problem — a downspout, grading, a leak — gets corrected. If water keeps saturating the clay, no lifting material fixes that.
Does mudjacking or polyjacking work in clay soil like Tulsa's?
Both methods work in expansive clay, but the soil changes the calculus. Oklahoma clay swells and shrinks with moisture, and heavy mudjacking slurry — roughly 100 pounds or more per cubic foot — adds real load to soil that's already unstable, which can contribute to re-settlement. Polyurethane foam weighs around 2 to 4 pounds per cubic foot, so it lifts the slab without meaningfully increasing the burden on the clay. That's a genuine advantage here, and it's part of why foam has become the default recommendation for Tulsa slabs sitting on troubled soil. It's not the whole story, though — for large voids under exterior concrete, slurry's density and price still make mudjacking a legitimate option.
Ready to get started?
Tell us what’s going on and we’ll match you with a local pro for a free estimate.